On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:34:52PM +0200, Anthony Harivel wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Daniel P. Berrangé, Apr 18, 2024 at 18:42:
>
> > > + if (kvm_is_rapl_feat_enable(cs)) {
> > > + if (!IS_INTEL_CPU(env)) {
> > > + error_setg(errp, "RAPL feature can only be\
> > > + enabled with Intel CPU models");
> > > + return false;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> >
> > I see a crash in kvm_is_rapl_feat_enable() from this caller,
> > when I run with this kind of command line:
> >
> > $ qemu-system-x86_64 \
> > -kernel /lib/modules/6.6.9-100.fc38.x86_64/vmlinuz \
> > -initrd tiny-initrd.img -m 2000 -serial stdio -nodefaults \
> > -display none -accel kvm -append "console=ttyS0 quiet"
> >
> >
> > #0 0x0000555555bc14b7 in kvm_is_rapl_feat_enable
> > (cs=cs@entry=0x555557b83470) at ../target/i386/kvm/kvm.c:2531
> > #1 0x0000555555bc7534 in kvm_cpu_realizefn (cs=0x555557b83470,
> > errp=0x7fffffffd2a0) at ../target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c:54
> > #2 0x0000555555d2432a in accel_cpu_common_realize (cpu=0x555557b83470,
> > errp=0x7fffffffd2a0) at ../accel/accel-target.c:130
> > #3 0x0000555555cdd955 in cpu_exec_realizefn (cpu=cpu@entry=0x555557b83470,
> > errp=errp@entry=0x7fffffffd2a0) at ../cpu-target.c:137
> > #4 0x0000555555c14b89 in x86_cpu_realizefn (dev=0x555557b83470,
> > errp=0x7fffffffd310) at ../target/i386/cpu.c:7320
> > #5 0x0000555555d58f4b in device_set_realized (obj=<optimized out>,
> > value=<optimized out>, errp=0x7fffffffd390) at ../hw/core/qdev.c:510
> > #6 0x0000555555d5d78d in property_set_bool (obj=0x555557b83470,
> > v=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, opaque=0x5555578558e0,
> > errp=0x7fffffffd390)
> > at ../qom/object.c:2358
> > #7 0x0000555555d60b0b in object_property_set
> > (obj=obj@entry=0x555557b83470, name=name@entry=0x55555607c799 "realized",
> > v=v@entry=0x555557b8ccb0, errp=0x7fffffffd390,
> > errp@entry=0x555556e210d8 <error_fatal>) at ../qom/object.c:1472
> > #8 0x0000555555d6444f in object_property_set_qobject
> > (obj=obj@entry=0x555557b83470, name=name@entry=0x55555607c799
> > "realized", value=value@entry=0x555557854800,
> > errp=errp@entry=0x555556e210d8 <error_fatal>)
> > at ../qom/qom-qobject.c:28
> > #9 0x0000555555d61174 in object_property_set_bool
> > (obj=0x555557b83470, name=name@entry=0x55555607c799 "realized",
> > value=value@entry=true, errp=errp@entry=0x555556e210d8 <error_fatal>) at
> > ../qom/object.c:1541
> > #10 0x0000555555d59a3c in qdev_realize (dev=<optimized out>,
> > bus=bus@entry=0x0, errp=errp@entry=0x555556e210d8 <error_fatal>) at
> > ../hw/core/qdev.c:292
> > #11 0x0000555555bd51e0 in x86_cpu_new (x86ms=<optimized out>, apic_id=0,
> > errp=0x555556e210d8 <error_fatal>) at ../hw/i386/x86.c:105
> > #12 0x0000555555bd52ce in x86_cpus_init (x86ms=x86ms@entry=0x555557aaed30,
> > default_cpu_version=<optimized out>) at ../hw/i386/x86.c:156
> > #13 0x0000555555bdc1a7 in pc_init1 (machine=0x555557aaed30,
> > pci_type=0x55555604aa61 "i440FX") at ../hw/i386/pc_piix.c:185
> > #14 0x0000555555947a11 in machine_run_board_init (machine=0x555557aaed30,
> > mem_path=<optimized out>, errp=<optimized out>, errp@entry=0x555556e210d8
> > <error_fatal>)
> > at ../hw/core/machine.c:1547
> > #15 0x0000555555b020ed in qemu_init_board () at ../system/vl.c:2613
> > #16 qmp_x_exit_preconfig (errp=0x555556e210d8 <error_fatal>) at
> > ../system/vl.c:2705
> > #17 0x0000555555b0611e in qemu_init (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized
> > out>) at ../system/vl.c:3739
> > #18 0x0000555555897ca9 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>)
> > at ../system/main.c:47
> >
> > The problem is that 'cs->kvm_state' is NULL here
> >
>
> After some investigation it seems that kvm_state is not yet committed
> at this point. Shame, because GDB showed me that we have already pass
> the kvm_accel_instance_init() in accel/kvm/kvm-all.c that sets the
> value "msr_energy.enable" in kvm_state...
>
> So should I dig more to still do the sanity check in kvm_cpu_realizefn()
> or should I already move the RAPL feature from -kvm to -cpu
> like suggested by Zhao from Intel and then access it from the CPUState ?
I'm not so sure about that question. I think Paolo is best placed
to suggest which is better, as the KVM maintainer.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
