On 5/22/24 1:01 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Since the realize() handler of CCWDeviceClass takes an 'Error **'
argument, best practices suggest to return a bool. See the api/error.h
Rules section. While at it, modify the call in s390_ccw_realize().

Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>


Reviewed-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrow...@linux.ibm.com>


---
  hw/s390x/ccw-device.h | 2 +-
  hw/s390x/ccw-device.c | 3 ++-
  hw/s390x/s390-ccw.c   | 3 +--
  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/ccw-device.h b/hw/s390x/ccw-device.h
index 
6dff95225df11c63f9b66975019026b215c8c448..5feeb0ee7a268b8709043b5bbc56b06e707a448d
 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/ccw-device.h
+++ b/hw/s390x/ccw-device.h
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_ccw_dev;
  struct CCWDeviceClass {
      DeviceClass parent_class;
      void (*unplug)(HotplugHandler *, DeviceState *, Error **);
-    void (*realize)(CcwDevice *, Error **);
+    bool (*realize)(CcwDevice *, Error **);
      void (*refill_ids)(CcwDevice *);
  };
diff --git a/hw/s390x/ccw-device.c b/hw/s390x/ccw-device.c
index 
fb8c1acc64d5002c861a4913f292d8346dbef192..a7d682e5af9ce90e7e2fad8c24b30e39328c7cf4
 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/ccw-device.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/ccw-device.c
@@ -31,9 +31,10 @@ static void ccw_device_refill_ids(CcwDevice *dev)
      dev->subch_id.valid = true;
  }
-static void ccw_device_realize(CcwDevice *dev, Error **errp)
+static bool ccw_device_realize(CcwDevice *dev, Error **errp)
  {
      ccw_device_refill_ids(dev);
+    return true;
  }
static Property ccw_device_properties[] = {
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-ccw.c
index 
a06e91dfb318e3500324851488c56806fa46c08d..4b8ede701df90949720262b6fc1b65f4e505e34d
 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-ccw.c
@@ -137,8 +137,7 @@ static void s390_ccw_realize(S390CCWDevice *cdev, char 
*sysfsdev, Error **errp)
          goto out_err;
      }
- ck->realize(ccw_dev, &err);
-    if (err) {
+    if (!ck->realize(ccw_dev, &err)) {
          goto out_err;
      }

Reply via email to