On 03/26/2012 02:37 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-03-26 21:35, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Since this is an easily refactorable thing to look at later, I think
we should
start with extracting the types.
My worry is that those three refactorings set bad examples for others.
So I'd like to avoid such back and forth if possible.
I'm not really worried about it. It's so easier to refactor this
later. Why rush it now?
You rush changing the current layout, not me. :)
No, I'm trying to do incremental changes without boiling the ocean in the
process.
I think we all are in violent agreement about where we want to end up (as opaque
types as possible). I don't want to hold back additional refactoring on doing
this right (and it's not just a matter of malloc/free).
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Jan
