On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 05:48:32PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > That property, irrelevant of what it is called (and I doubt whether Dan's > suggestion on "shared-ram" is good, e.g. mmap(MAP_SHARED) doesn't have user > visible fd but it's shared-ram for sure..), is yet another way to specify > guest mem types. > > What if the user specified this property but specified something else in > the -object parameters? E.g. -machine share-ram=on -object > memory-backend-ram,share=off. What should we do?
The machine property would only apply to memory regions that are *NOT* being created via -object. The memory-backend objects would always honour their own share settnig. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
