On 6/4/24 07:40, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 18/19] intel_iommu: Implement
>> [set|unset]_iommu_device() callbacks
>>
>> Hi Zhenzhong,
>>
>> On 6/3/24 08:10, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>> From: Yi Liu <yi.l....@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Implement [set|unset]_iommu_device() callbacks in Intel vIOMMU.
>>> In set call, a new structure VTDHostIOMMUDevice which holds
>>> a reference to HostIOMMUDevice is stored in hash table
>>> indexed by PCI BDF.
>> maybe precise that this is not the aliased one?
> Sure.
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l....@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y....@linux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.d...@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h |  9 ++++
>>>  include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h  |  2 +
>>>  hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          | 76
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>> b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>>> index f8cf99bddf..b800d62ca0 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>>  #ifndef HW_I386_INTEL_IOMMU_INTERNAL_H
>>>  #define HW_I386_INTEL_IOMMU_INTERNAL_H
>>>  #include "hw/i386/intel_iommu.h"
>>> +#include "sysemu/host_iommu_device.h"
>>>
>>>  /*
>>>   * Intel IOMMU register specification
>>> @@ -537,4 +538,12 @@ typedef struct VTDRootEntry VTDRootEntry;
>>>  #define VTD_SL_IGN_COM              0xbff0000000000000ULL
>>>  #define VTD_SL_TM                   (1ULL << 62)
>>>
>>> +
>>> +typedef struct VTDHostIOMMUDevice {
>>> +    IntelIOMMUState *iommu_state;
>> Why do you need the iommu_state?
> It is used in nesting series.
>
>>> +    PCIBus *bus;
>>> +    uint8_t devfn;
>>> +    HostIOMMUDevice *dev;
>>> +    QLIST_ENTRY(VTDHostIOMMUDevice) next;
>>> +} VTDHostIOMMUDevice;
>> How VTD specific is it?
> In nesting series, it has element iommu_state and errata
> which are VTD specific.

so at least I would add a comment in the commit message explaining this.


>
>>>  #endif
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
>> b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
>>> index 7d694b0813..2bbde41e45 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
>>> @@ -293,6 +293,8 @@ struct IntelIOMMUState {
>>>      /* list of registered notifiers */
>>>      QLIST_HEAD(, VTDAddressSpace) vtd_as_with_notifiers;
>>>
>>> +    GHashTable *vtd_host_iommu_dev;             /* VTDHostIOMMUDevice
>> */
>>> +
>>>      /* interrupt remapping */
>>>      bool intr_enabled;              /* Whether guest enabled IR */
>>>      dma_addr_t intr_root;           /* Interrupt remapping table pointer */
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> index 519063c8f8..747c988bc4 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> @@ -237,6 +237,13 @@ static gboolean vtd_as_equal(gconstpointer v1,
>> gconstpointer v2)
>>>             (key1->pasid == key2->pasid);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static gboolean vtd_as_idev_equal(gconstpointer v1, gconstpointer v2)
>>> +{
>>> +    const struct vtd_as_key *key1 = v1;
>>> +    const struct vtd_as_key *key2 = v2;
>>> +
>>> +    return (key1->bus == key2->bus) && (key1->devfn == key2->devfn);
>>> +}
>> can't you reuse the key with pasid?
> s->vtd_host_iommu_dev isn't indexed by pasid but only BDF.
> Maybe I'd better to define its own key struct, hash() and equal() functions.
you could set a default pasid. But up to you

Eric
>
>>>  /*
>>>   * Note that we use pointer to PCIBus as the key, so hashing/shifting
>>>   * based on the pointer value is intended. Note that we deal with
>>> @@ -3812,6 +3819,70 @@ VTDAddressSpace
>> *vtd_find_add_as(IntelIOMMUState *s, PCIBus *bus,
>>>      return vtd_dev_as;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static bool vtd_dev_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int
>> devfn,
>>> +                                     HostIOMMUDevice *hiod, Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> +    IntelIOMMUState *s = opaque;
>>> +    VTDHostIOMMUDevice *vtd_hdev;
>>> +    struct vtd_as_key key = {
>>> +        .bus = bus,
>>> +        .devfn = devfn,
>>> +    };
>>> +    struct vtd_as_key *new_key;
>>> +
>>> +    assert(hiod);
>>> +
>>> +    vtd_iommu_lock(s);
>>> +
>>> +    vtd_hdev = g_hash_table_lookup(s->vtd_host_iommu_dev, &key);
>>> +
>>> +    if (vtd_hdev) {
>>> +        error_setg(errp, "IOMMUFD device already exist");
>> s/IOMMUFD/Host IOMMU device?
> Good catch, will fix.
>
> Thanks
> Zhenzhong
>
>>> +        vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
>>> +        return false;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    vtd_hdev = g_malloc0(sizeof(VTDHostIOMMUDevice));
>>> +    vtd_hdev->bus = bus;
>>> +    vtd_hdev->devfn = (uint8_t)devfn;
>>> +    vtd_hdev->iommu_state = s;
>>> +    vtd_hdev->dev = hiod;
>>> +
>>> +    new_key = g_malloc(sizeof(*new_key));
>>> +    new_key->bus = bus;
>>> +    new_key->devfn = devfn;
>>> +
>>> +    object_ref(hiod);
>>> +    g_hash_table_insert(s->vtd_host_iommu_dev, new_key, vtd_hdev);
>>> +
>>> +    vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
>>> +
>>> +    return true;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void vtd_dev_unset_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int
>> devfn)
>>> +{
>>> +    IntelIOMMUState *s = opaque;
>>> +    VTDHostIOMMUDevice *vtd_hdev;
>>> +    struct vtd_as_key key = {
>>> +        .bus = bus,
>>> +        .devfn = devfn,
>>> +    };
>>> +
>>> +    vtd_iommu_lock(s);
>>> +
>>> +    vtd_hdev = g_hash_table_lookup(s->vtd_host_iommu_dev, &key);
>>> +    if (!vtd_hdev) {
>>> +        vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
>>> +        return;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    g_hash_table_remove(s->vtd_host_iommu_dev, &key);
>>> +    object_unref(vtd_hdev->dev);
>>> +
>>> +    vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  /* Unmap the whole range in the notifier's scope. */
>>>  static void vtd_address_space_unmap(VTDAddressSpace *as,
>> IOMMUNotifier *n)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -4116,6 +4187,8 @@ static AddressSpace
>> *vtd_host_dma_iommu(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int devfn)
>>>  static PCIIOMMUOps vtd_iommu_ops = {
>>>      .get_address_space = vtd_host_dma_iommu,
>>> +    .set_iommu_device = vtd_dev_set_iommu_device,
>>> +    .unset_iommu_device = vtd_dev_unset_iommu_device,
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s, Error **errp)
>>> @@ -4235,6 +4308,9 @@ static void vtd_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
>> **errp)
>>>                                       g_free, g_free);
>>>      s->vtd_address_spaces = g_hash_table_new_full(vtd_as_hash,
>> vtd_as_equal,
>>>                                        g_free, g_free);
>>> +    s->vtd_host_iommu_dev = g_hash_table_new_full(vtd_as_hash,
>>> +                                                  vtd_as_idev_equal,
>>> +                                                  g_free, g_free);
>>>      vtd_init(s);
>>>      pci_setup_iommu(bus, &vtd_iommu_ops, dev);
>>>      /* Pseudo address space under root PCI bus. */
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric


Reply via email to