On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 3:34 PM Alexander Monakov <amona...@ispras.ru> wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > I found out from the mailing list. My Core2-based desktop would be > > > > affected. > > > > > > Do you run QEMU on it? With KVM or TCG? > > > > Excuse me? Are you going to ask for SSH access to ensure my computer really > > exists and is in working order? > > Come on. The thing is, I'm not debating the existence of computers > that don't have x86_64-v2, but I *am* debating the usefulness of > making QEMU run on them and any extra information can be interesting.
I think it will be useful to me, with KVM and TCG both. > > Can you tell me why you never commented on buffer_is_zero improvements, > > where > > v1 was sent in October? Just trying to understand how you care for 2% of > > L1D > > use but could be ok with those kinds of speedups be dropped on the floor. > > I'm not sure if there is any overlap in the scenarios where > buffer_is_zero performance matters, and x86 emulation. People can care > about thing A but not thing B. If there's anything that you think I > can help reviewing, feel free to let me know offlist. In that case I would've appreciated an early indication you're not interested, making Cc'ing you on followups unnecessary. Alexander
