On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 09:42:21AM GMT, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 02:59:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 02:02:30PM GMT, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 03:01:28PM GMT, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > This series should be in a good shape, in which tree should we queue it?
> > > @Micheal would your tree be okay?
> >
> > Markus suggested a small change to patch 10, so do you want me to resend
the whole series, or is it okay to resend just the last 3 patches (which are also the
ones that depend on the other patch queued by Markus)?
>
> I guess you mean
>
> [PATCH v2] qapi: clarify that the default is backend dependent
> Message-ID: <20240611130231.83152-1-sgarz...@redhat.com>
Yep!
>
> > In the last case I would ask you to queue up the first 9 patches of this
series if that is okay with you.
>
> Michael, feel free to merge the patch I queued.
>
I can also include it in v8 if it helps.
Thanks,
Stefano
If I'm to merge it, pls do.
Much less error prone.
Okay, I'll include it in v8.
I'll wait until tomorrow to see if there's any objection on the tree,
but I think yours is the most suitable.
Thanks,
Stefano
