On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:49:20 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Regarding device_add ? and device_add foo,? I would implement it as > separate QMP commands hooking into QOM, such as qom_list_types (taking > the superclass as an optional argument) and qom_properties. But the > latter first needs static properties to move up from devices to objects. Yes, after I suggested query-devices I remembered about qom_list_types. I think it's ok for hmp.c to use it even if it's not declared stable yet, right? Anthony, you said you did it in your tree differently, did you? I think using qom_list_types is the way to go here...
