On 7/4/24 07:50, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 16:41 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
While looking into Zoltan's attempt to speed up ppc64 DCBZ
(data cache block set to zero), I wondered what AArch64 was
doing differently. It turned out that Arm is the only user
of tlb_vaddr_to_host.
None of the code sequences in use between AArch64, Power64 and S390X
are 100% safe, with race conditions vs mmap et al, however, AArch64
is the only one that will fail this single threaded test case. Use
of these new functions fixes the race condition as well, though I
have not yet touched the other guests.
I thought about exposing accel/tcg/user-retaddr.h for direct use
from the targets, but perhaps these wrappers are cleaner. RFC?
r~
Richard Henderson (2):
accel/tcg: Introduce memset_ra, memmove_ra
target/arm: Use memset_ra, memmove_ra in helper-a64.c
include/exec/cpu_ldst.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++
accel/tcg/user-exec.c | 22 +++++++++
target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c | 10 ++--
tests/tcg/multiarch/memset-fault.c | 77
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tests/tcg/multiarch/memset-fault.c
This sounds good to me.
I haven't debugged it, but I wonder why doesn't s390x fail here.
For XC with src == dst, it does access_memset() -> do_access_memset()
-> memset() without setting the RA. And I don't think that anything
around it sets the RA either.
s390x uses probe_access_flags, which verifies the page is mapped and writable, and raises
the exception when it isn't. In contrast, for user-only, tlb_vaddr_to_host *only*
performs the guest -> host address mapping, i.e. (addr + guest_base).
r~
