On 11.07.24 16:36, Fiona Ebner wrote:
There is no protection against two callers of cbw_snapshot_read_lock()
calling reqlist_init_req() with overlapping ranges, and
reqlist_init_req() asserts that there are no conflicting requests.

In particular, two cbw_co_snapshot_block_status() callers can race,
with the second calling reqlist_init_req() before the first one
finishes and removes its conflicting request, leading to an assertion
failure.

Reproducer script [0] and backtrace [1] are attached below.


Understand. But seems in case of CBW read-lock, nothing bad in intersecting 
read requests?

reqlist is shared with backup, where we care to avoid intersecting requests in 
the list. What about just move the assertion to block_copy_task_create() ? And 
add comment somewhere that we support intersecting reads in frozen_read_reqs.



[0]:

#!/bin/bash -e
dd if=/dev/urandom of=/tmp/disk.raw bs=1M count=1024
./qemu-img create /tmp/fleecing.raw -f raw 1G
(
./qemu-system-x86_64 --qmp stdio \
--blockdev raw,node-name=node0,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/disk.raw \
--blockdev raw,node-name=node1,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/fleecing.raw 
\
<<EOF
{"execute": "qmp_capabilities"}
{"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": { "driver": "copy-before-write", "file": "node0", "target": 
"node1", "node-name": "node3" } }
{"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": { "driver": "snapshot-access", "file": "node3", 
"node-name": "snap0" } }
{"execute": "nbd-server-start", "arguments": {"addr": { "type": "unix", "data": { "path": 
"/tmp/nbd.socket" } } } }
{"execute": "block-export-add", "arguments": {"id": "exp0", "node-name": "snap0", "type": "nbd", 
"name": "exp0"}}
EOF
) &
sleep 5
while true; do
./qemu-nbd -d /dev/nbd0
./qemu-nbd -c /dev/nbd0 nbd:unix:/tmp/nbd.socket:exportname=exp0 -f raw -r
nbdinfo --map 'nbd+unix:///exp0?socket=/tmp/nbd.socket'
done

[1]:

#5  0x000071e5f0088eb2 in __GI___assert_fail (...) at ./assert/assert.c:101
#6  0x0000615285438017 in reqlist_init_req (...) at ../block/reqlist.c:23
#7  0x00006152853e2d98 in cbw_snapshot_read_lock (...) at 
../block/copy-before-write.c:237
#8  0x00006152853e3068 in cbw_co_snapshot_block_status (...) at 
../block/copy-before-write.c:304
#9  0x00006152853f4d22 in bdrv_co_snapshot_block_status (...) at 
../block/io.c:3726
#10 0x000061528543a63e in snapshot_access_co_block_status (...) at 
../block/snapshot-access.c:48
#11 0x00006152853f1a0a in bdrv_co_do_block_status (...) at ../block/io.c:2474
#12 0x00006152853f2016 in bdrv_co_common_block_status_above (...) at 
../block/io.c:2652
#13 0x00006152853f22cf in bdrv_co_block_status_above (...) at ../block/io.c:2732
#14 0x00006152853d9a86 in blk_co_block_status_above (...) at 
../block/block-backend.c:1473
#15 0x000061528538da6c in blockstatus_to_extents (...) at ../nbd/server.c:2374
#16 0x000061528538deb1 in nbd_co_send_block_status (...) at ../nbd/server.c:2481
#17 0x000061528538f424 in nbd_handle_request (...) at ../nbd/server.c:2978
#18 0x000061528538f906 in nbd_trip (...) at ../nbd/server.c:3121
#19 0x00006152855a7caf in coroutine_trampoline (...) at 
../util/coroutine-ucontext.c:175

Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.eb...@proxmox.com>
---
  block/copy-before-write.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/block/copy-before-write.c b/block/copy-before-write.c
index 853e01a1eb..376ff3f3e1 100644
--- a/block/copy-before-write.c
+++ b/block/copy-before-write.c
@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ cbw_snapshot_read_lock(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t 
offset, int64_t bytes,
          *req = (BlockReq) {.offset = -1, .bytes = -1};
          *file = s->target;
      } else {
+        reqlist_wait_all(&s->frozen_read_reqs, offset, bytes, &s->lock);
          reqlist_init_req(&s->frozen_read_reqs, req, offset, bytes);
          *file = bs->file;
      }

--
Best regards,
Vladimir


Reply via email to