On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 03:25:23PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 07:44:39PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 11/07/2024 16.39, Fabiano Rosas wrote: > >> > Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes: > >> ... > >> > > Things that need further attention though: > >> > > > >> > > - All tests that use the LinuxTest / LinuxDistro classes (e.g. based > >> > > on cloud-init images) really depend on the Avocado framework, > >> > > thus we'd need a solution for those if we want to continue with > >> > > this approach > >> > > > >> > > - Same for all tests that require the LinuxSSHMixIn class - we'd > >> > > need to provide a solution for ssh-based tests, too. > >> > > >> > These two seem to be dependent mostly avocado/utils only. Those could > >> > still be used without the whole framework, no? Say we keep importing > >> > avocado.utils, but run everything from meson, would that make sense? > >> > >> Yes ... maybe ... I can give it a try to see whether that works. > > > > We only import about 8 modules from avocado.utils. There are probably a > > few more indirectly used, but worst case we just clone the bits we need > > into the QEMU tree. > > Is Avocado still actively developed? I thought you guys used it quite > widely within RedHat?
Yes it is active: https://github.com/avocado-framework/avocado/commits/master/ With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
