From: BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu>

Instead of using a local ret variable return directly and remove the
local.

Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
---
 target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
index 799d2ced9b..a5ae11394d 100644
--- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
+++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
@@ -98,9 +98,6 @@ static int ppc6xx_tlb_pte_check(mmu_ctx_t *ctx, target_ulong 
pte0,
                                 target_ulong pte1, int pteh,
                                 MMUAccessType access_type)
 {
-    int ret;
-
-    ret = -1;
     /* Check validity and table match */
     if (pte_is_valid(pte0) && ((pte0 >> 6) & 1) == pteh) {
         /* Check vsid & api */
@@ -118,16 +115,15 @@ static int ppc6xx_tlb_pte_check(mmu_ctx_t *ctx, 
target_ulong pte0,
             if (check_prot_access_type(ctx->prot, access_type)) {
                 /* Access granted */
                 qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "PTE access granted !\n");
-                ret = 0;
+                return 0;
             } else {
                 /* Access right violation */
                 qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "PTE access rejected\n");
-                ret = -2;
+                return -2;
             }
         }
     }
-
-    return ret;
+    return -1;
 }
 
 static int pte_update_flags(mmu_ctx_t *ctx, target_ulong *pte1p,
-- 
2.45.2


Reply via email to