From: BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu> Instead of using a local ret variable return directly and remove the local.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> --- target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c index 799d2ced9b..a5ae11394d 100644 --- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c +++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c @@ -98,9 +98,6 @@ static int ppc6xx_tlb_pte_check(mmu_ctx_t *ctx, target_ulong pte0, target_ulong pte1, int pteh, MMUAccessType access_type) { - int ret; - - ret = -1; /* Check validity and table match */ if (pte_is_valid(pte0) && ((pte0 >> 6) & 1) == pteh) { /* Check vsid & api */ @@ -118,16 +115,15 @@ static int ppc6xx_tlb_pte_check(mmu_ctx_t *ctx, target_ulong pte0, if (check_prot_access_type(ctx->prot, access_type)) { /* Access granted */ qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "PTE access granted !\n"); - ret = 0; + return 0; } else { /* Access right violation */ qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "PTE access rejected\n"); - ret = -2; + return -2; } } } - - return ret; + return -1; } static int pte_update_flags(mmu_ctx_t *ctx, target_ulong *pte1p, -- 2.45.2