On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 09:35:51AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > But for this use case, we only need a memory region that the hypervisor > can update. We don't need any of that complexity of gratuitously > interrupting all the vCPUs just to ensure that none of them can be > running userspace while one of them does an update for itself, > potentially translating from one ABI to another. The hypervisor can > just update the user-visible memory in place.
Looks like then your userspace is hypervisor specific, and that's a problem because it's a one way street - there is no way for hypervisor to know what does userspace need, so no way for hypervisor to know which information to provide. No real way to fix bugs. -- MST
