On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-04-03 15:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in > >> kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed > >> KVM_SIGNAL_MSI IOCTL. > >> > >> This series depends on "kvm: set gsi_bits and max_gsi correctly" > >> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/88906). > > > > Looks good to me. > > How hard would it be to add irqfd support? > > Shouldn't be, but the changes will be a bit bigger. > > I'm thinking about a revamped interface between the MSI core and > affected devices for a while. Will try to put down in some lines of code > what I have in mind - once the dynamic MSI injection topic has settled. > > Jan
Yes it's not an objection - just a question. > -- > Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 > Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
