On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-04-05 14:56, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Il 05/04/2012 14:53, malc ha scritto: > >> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> > >>> Il 05/04/2012 14:30, malc ha scritto: > >>>>>> Would save that "* 1000". I just wondered why we do not use it > >>>>>> elsewhere > >>>>>> in QEMU and was reluctant to risk some BSD breakage. > >>>>>> > >>>> It's probably worth mentioning that using anything other than > >>>> clock_gettime and CLOCK_MONOTONING (as well as setting proper pthread > >>>> clock attr on the condition variable) is prone to the surprises (such > >>>> as NTP corrections and daylight saving changes). > >>> > >>> I was about to suggest the same, but how widespread is support for > >>> pthread_condattr_setclock? > >> > >> If it's not all is lost anyway. > > > > Only once every year. :) > > ...and not for the current user of this service which do not care that > much about the timeout and a potential delay or early shot. >
An hour of potential delay mind you. -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
