On 10 April 2012 11:30, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Independent of what frequency of machine versions we offer, I think > defaulting to pc-1.0 is a bad idea. The people fiddling with QEMU > command lines are mostly developers, others can be expected to use a > more convenient frontend, such as libvirt or oVirt. I would hope that > updating any of these frontends to supply a -M pc-1.0 argument would be > possible without much effort. Expecting developers to type -M pc-next > again and again will result in pc-next not being tested as much and thus > broken quickly.
To throw in a tangential non-x86 perspective, I would prefer that there be no -M default at all. For ARM at any rate there is no machine which is inherently preferable or better than any other; the current default is integratorcp simply because it happened to be the first one implemented, and this tends to lead to user errors where people don't realise that not passing in a -M option results in their getting an ancient and barely maintained model... -- PMM
