Le 30/09/2024 à 15:26, Marc-André Lureau a écrit :
Hi Laurent
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 4:19 PM Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu> wrote:
CC Helge Deller
Le 30/09/2024 à 10:14, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com a écrit :
From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
../linux-user/hppa/cpu_loop.c: In function ‘hppa_lws’:
../linux-user/hppa/cpu_loop.c:106:17: error: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized
[-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
106 | env->gr[28] = ret;
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
---
linux-user/hppa/cpu_loop.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/hppa/cpu_loop.c b/linux-user/hppa/cpu_loop.c
index bc093b8fe8..f4da95490e 100644
--- a/linux-user/hppa/cpu_loop.c
+++ b/linux-user/hppa/cpu_loop.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static abi_ulong hppa_lws(CPUHPPAState *env)
old = tswap32(old);
new = tswap32(new);
ret = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)g2h(cs, addr), old, new);
- ret = tswap32(ret);
+ env->gr[28] = tswap32(ret);
break;
case 2: /* elf32 atomic "new" cmpxchg */
@@ -64,19 +64,19 @@ static abi_ulong hppa_lws(CPUHPPAState *env)
old = *(uint8_t *)g2h(cs, old);
new = *(uint8_t *)g2h(cs, new);
ret = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint8_t *)g2h(cs, addr), old, new);
- ret = ret != old;
+ env->gr[28] = ret != old;
break;
case 1:
old = *(uint16_t *)g2h(cs, old);
new = *(uint16_t *)g2h(cs, new);
ret = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint16_t *)g2h(cs, addr), old, new);
- ret = ret != old;
+ env->gr[28] = ret != old;
break;
case 2:
old = *(uint32_t *)g2h(cs, old);
new = *(uint32_t *)g2h(cs, new);
ret = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)g2h(cs, addr), old, new);
- ret = ret != old;
+ env->gr[28] = ret != old;
break;
case 3:
{
@@ -97,13 +97,13 @@ static abi_ulong hppa_lws(CPUHPPAState *env)
}
end_exclusive();
#endif
+ env->gr[28] = ret;
}
break;
}
break;
}
- env->gr[28] = ret;
return 0;
}
Did you try to put a g_assert_not_reached() in a "default:" for "switch(size)"?
This should help the compiler to know that "env->gr[28] = ret;" will not be
reached if ret is not set.
That works! I'll change the patch and include your r-b then?
Yes, you can
Thanks,
Laurent