On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 03:09:29PM +0300, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024, 12:14 PM Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 01/10/2024 10.50, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
> > > Hello Thomas,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 20:18, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> Shortly after we switched to the original URLs on
> > qemu-advent-calendar.org,
> > >> the server went offline - looks like we are better off using the gitlab
> > >> URLs again instead.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> > >> ---
> > > [snip]
> > >> diff --git a/tests/functional/test_microblazeel_s3adsp1800.py b/tests/
> > >> functional/test_microblazeel_s3adsp1800.py
> > >> index faa3927f2e..47c941d487 100755
> > >> --- a/tests/functional/test_microblazeel_s3adsp1800.py
> > >> +++ b/tests/functional/test_microblazeel_s3adsp1800.py
> > >> @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ class MicroblazeelMachine(QemuSystemTest):
> > >> timeout = 90
> > >>
> > >> ASSET_IMAGE = Asset(
> > >> - ('
> > http://www.qemu-advent-calendar.org/2023/download/day13.tar.gz'),
> > >> -
> > 'b9b3d43c5dd79db88ada495cc6e0d1f591153fe41355e925d791fbf44de50c22')
> > >> + ('
> > https://qemu-advcal.gitlab.io/qac-best-of-multiarch/download/
> > >> day13.tar.xz'),
> > >> +
> > '67e4c502651f8801e724ecc26403f1d0cdbc00549b033166e2e8cd14e9d49fef')
> > >>
> > >> def test_microblazeel_s3adsp1800(self):
> > >> self.require_netdev('user')
> > >
> > > I downloaded both day13.tar.gz and day13.tar.xz and these archives have
> > > different file contents, is that on purpose?
> >
> > Oh, drat! That's a different package, indeed - it's the one from 2018, not
> > the one from 2023! I didn't really notice since I did not remove my
> > tests/functional/ folder before re-running the tests, so this test was
> > silently re-using the old binary from the previous test runs :-/
> > (note to myself: we should maybe remove the binaries after each test run).
> >
> > Thanks for spotting it!
> >
> > Meanwhile, the www.qemu-advent-calendar.org website seems to be back, so
> > maybe we don't need this patch here anymore... let's wait and see whether
> > it
> > remains stable now...
>
>
> Suggestion: Add a list of source URLs in Asset() so that it has a fallback
> if the first host cannot be reached, maybe you can respin the patch to do
> this?
If the first host URL isn't reliable then we shouldn't use it at all, just
point directly to the 2nd reliable URL. If neither of the URLs are considered
reliable then we shouldn't have the test enabled at all IMHO.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
