On Tue,  1 Oct 2024 09:03:42 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+hua...@kernel.org> wrote:

> Align the header file with the actual implementation of
> this function, as the first argument is source ID and not
> notification type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+hua...@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>

> 
> ---
> 
> Changes from v8:
> - Non-rename/cleanup changes merged altogether;
> - source ID is now more generic, defined per guest target.
>   That should make easier to add support for 86.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+hua...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/hw/acpi/ghes.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h b/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> index 20016c226d1f..50e3a25ea384 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ void acpi_build_hest(GArray *table_data, GArray 
> *hardware_errors,
>                       const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id);
>  void acpi_ghes_add_fw_cfg(AcpiGhesState *vms, FWCfgState *s,
>                            GArray *hardware_errors);
> -int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint8_t notify, uint64_t error_physical_addr);
> +int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint8_t source_id, uint64_t error_physical_addr);
>  
>  /**
>   * acpi_ghes_present: Report whether ACPI GHES table is present


Reply via email to