25.10.2024 18:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Hi! No, this is totally ok for 9.1.x; it missed 9.1 but it was already submitted back then and it's okay to apply it there.On the other hand, Richard wrote some large cleanup patches to enable this relatively small patch. The bug has been there for many years, we can keep it in 9.0.x and earlier.
Aha. That makes good sense. Thank you for the follow-up and for clearing my confusion :) /mjt
