I'll be removing the extra line in the comment and adding a new patch
modifying the link in version 2.

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 4:53 AM Peter Maydell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 19:10, Roque Arcudia Hernandez <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Current watchdog is free running out of reset, this combined with the
> > fact that current implementation also ensures the counter is running
> > when programing WDOGLOAD creates issues when the firmware defer the
> > programing of WDOGCONTROL.INTEN much later after WDOGLOAD. Arm
> > Programmer's Model documentation states that INTEN is also the
> > counter enable:
> >
> > > INTEN
> > >
> > > Enable the interrupt event, WDOGINT. Set HIGH to enable the counter
> > > and the interrupt, or LOW to disable the counter and interrupt.
> > > Reloads the counter from the value in WDOGLOAD when the interrupt
> > > is enabled, after previously being disabled.
> >
> > Source of the time of writing:
> >
> > https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0479/d/apb-components/apb-watchdog/programmers-model
>
> I see that the URL in the current sources
> https://developer.arm.com/products/system-design/system-design-kits/cortex-m-system-design-kit
> is no longer working -- would you mind including a patch that updates
> the URL in the comment at the top of the file to the new one
> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0479/
>
> please?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Roque Arcudia Hernandez <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Longfield <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Joe Komlodi <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  hw/watchdog/cmsdk-apb-watchdog.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/watchdog/cmsdk-apb-watchdog.c 
> > b/hw/watchdog/cmsdk-apb-watchdog.c
> > index 7ad46f9410..e6ddc0a53b 100644
> > --- a/hw/watchdog/cmsdk-apb-watchdog.c
> > +++ b/hw/watchdog/cmsdk-apb-watchdog.c
> > @@ -202,10 +202,10 @@ static void cmsdk_apb_watchdog_write(void *opaque, 
> > hwaddr offset,
> >           */
> >          ptimer_transaction_begin(s->timer);
> >          ptimer_set_limit(s->timer, value, 1);
> > -        ptimer_run(s->timer, 0);
> >          ptimer_transaction_commit(s->timer);
> >          break;
>
> This looks like a correct change, but the comment just
> above here needs to be updated to match it (it currently
> says "and make sure we're counting").
>
> Otherwise this change looks good.
>
> -- PMM

Reply via email to