On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 17 April 2012 21:19, Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 21:58, Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> What is the use case of the default board? >> >> If an architecture has multiple boards, the default board can be used >> without using -M option. > > Unless the Xtensa architecture has a particular board which > is and will *always* be a primary choice for anybody using it > (as "pc" is for x86) I'd recommend against setting a default > board for it, because once you set one you can never change > it without breaking command-line compatibility for users.
Ok, I got it. I'd say there's no such board. 'sim' could be the default board, but it's useless without semihosting, and enabling semihosting by default looks like a security issue. -- Thanks. -- Max
