On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 08:17:09PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:40, Xin Tong <xerox.time.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > that is possible. but if that is the case, why not split the tlb
> > walking and the tlb fill ? can anyone please confirm ?
> 
> I sent a patch earlier that did something like that but it wasn't very
> successful:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-04/msg00992.html

  So functions like __ldb_mmu actually don't need to walk the TLB again?
Why you said the patch was't very successful? I don't others' comment
against the patch.

Regards,
chenwj

-- 
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj

Reply via email to