On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 08:17:09PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:40, Xin Tong <xerox.time.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > that is possible. but if that is the case, why not split the tlb > > walking and the tlb fill ? can anyone please confirm ? > > I sent a patch earlier that did something like that but it wasn't very > successful: > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-04/msg00992.html
So functions like __ldb_mmu actually don't need to walk the TLB again? Why you said the patch was't very successful? I don't others' comment against the patch. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj
