On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 08:20:42AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > The Realm Personalization Value (RPV) is provided by the user to
> > distinguish Realms that have the same initial measurement.
> >
> > The user provides up to 64 hexadecimal bytes. They are stored into the
> > RPV in the same order, zero-padded on the right.
> >
> > Cc: Eric Blake <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Eduardo Habkost <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v2->v3: Fix documentation
> > ---
> > qapi/qom.json | 15 ++++++
> > target/arm/kvm-rme.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/qapi/qom.json b/qapi/qom.json
> > index a8beeabf1f..f982850bca 100644
> > --- a/qapi/qom.json
> > +++ b/qapi/qom.json
> > @@ -1068,6 +1068,19 @@
> > 'data': { '*cpu-affinity': ['uint16'],
> > '*node-affinity': ['uint16'] } }
> >
> > +##
> > +# @RmeGuestProperties:
> > +#
> > +# Properties for rme-guest objects.
> > +#
> > +# @personalization-value: Realm personalization value, as a 64-byte
> > +# hex string. This optional parameter allows to uniquely identify
> > +# the VM instance during attestation. (default: 0)
>
> QMP commonly uses base64 for encoding binary data. Any particular
> reason to deviate?
>
> Is the "hex string" to be mapped to binary in little or big endian? Not
> an issue with base64.
Agreed, using base64 is preferrable for consistency.
>
> Nitpick: (default: all-zero), please, for consistency with similar
> documentation in SevSnpGuestProperties.
>
> > +#
> > +# Since: 9.3
There is never any x.3 version of QEMU, as we bump the major
version once a year. IOW, next release you could target this
for will be 10.0
> > +##
> > +{ 'struct': 'RmeGuestProperties',
> > + 'data': { '*personalization-value': 'str' } }
> >
> > ##
> > # @ObjectType:
> > @@ -1121,6 +1134,7 @@
> > { 'name': 'pr-manager-helper',
> > 'if': 'CONFIG_LINUX' },
> > 'qtest',
> > + 'rme-guest',
> > 'rng-builtin',
> > 'rng-egd',
> > { 'name': 'rng-random',
>
> The commit message claims the patch adds a parameter. It actually adds
> an entire object type.
The object should be added to qom.json earlier in this series when
the RmeGuest class is defined, then this patch would merely be adding
the parameter.
>
> > @@ -1195,6 +1209,7 @@
> > 'pr-manager-helper': { 'type': 'PrManagerHelperProperties',
> > 'if': 'CONFIG_LINUX' },
> > 'qtest': 'QtestProperties',
> > + 'rme-guest': 'RmeGuestProperties',
> > 'rng-builtin': 'RngProperties',
> > 'rng-egd': 'RngEgdProperties',
> > 'rng-random': { 'type': 'RngRandomProperties',
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
