On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 at 14:23, Brian Cain <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 12/2/2024 2:43 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > On 23/11/24 17:46, Brian Cain wrote: > >> From: Brian Cain <[email protected]> > >> > >> Also: add mapping for "[email protected]" which was ~briefly > >> used for some replies to mailing list traffic. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Brian Cain <[email protected]> > >> Signed-off-by: Brian Cain <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> .mailmap | 2 ++ > >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> > > > Forgive my ignorance here -- this T-b is - stronger than a R-b? or > weaker than a R-b? Or wholly orthogonal to R-b?
They mean different things -- T-b says "I tested this patch and it works for me", and R-b says "I looked at the code change and think it's a good change with no bugs". T-b is a slightly odd thing to have on a MAINTAINERS change, though I'm guessing Philippe might mean they tested that the .mailmap change affected the commits the way it was supposed to. > Should I still seek a R-b before making a pull request with this change? Philippe put this into his pullreq he just sent out, so you don't need to do anything more on your end. thanks -- PMM
