On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:39:36PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 20.04.2012 06:16, schrieb David Gibson:
> > I'm really hoping I can get some extra review of this code path. I
> > believe it's correct, but it's not straightforward to test, since it
> > will not be exercise by correct guest software.
>
> Sounds like a good case for qtest. Did you consider that?
Only in the sense that I really hope to be able to find time sometime
to get my head around qtest so I can use it for this amongst other
things.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
