shvstvala is defined in RVA22 as: "vstval must be written in all cases described above for stval."
By "cases describe above" the doc refer to the description of sstvala: "stval must be written with the faulting virtual address for load, store, and instruction page-fault, access-fault, and misaligned exceptions, and for breakpoint exceptions other than those caused by execution of the EBREAK or C.EBREAK instructions. For virtual-instruction and illegal-instruction exceptions, stval must be written with the faulting instruction." We already have sstvala, and our vstval follows the same rules as stval, so we can claim to support shvstvala too. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <[email protected]> --- target/riscv/cpu.c | 1 + tests/data/acpi/riscv64/virt/RHCT | Bin 346 -> 356 bytes 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c index 7091eb683e..f4997f488e 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ const RISCVIsaExtData isa_edata_arr[] = { ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zhinx, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zhinx), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zhinxmin, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zhinxmin), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(shcounterenw, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, has_priv_1_12), + ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(shvstvala, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, has_priv_1_12), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smaia, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smaia), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smcntrpmf, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smcntrpmf), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(smepmp, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_smepmp), diff --git a/tests/data/acpi/riscv64/virt/RHCT b/tests/data/acpi/riscv64/virt/RHCT index 460808d017baef93ccdd8fd8d1d4722edefd3b86..15b82b5bb1cf24cf501e74cb82682742e0041ea6 100644 GIT binary patch delta 48 zcmcb`^n{5k$iq1#g^_`Q@%ltA16C$RMuwjg?YDDelogkhCFUef{1V4u#mK<m!pOh? E09kzvYXATM delta 39 vcmaFDbc=~A$iq1#ijjeV(RCu10qYM2Muztj?YB>2jNvd~WMHsjWMBXQ)M*Jp -- 2.47.1
