On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:36:39 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 23/04/2012 20:04, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: > > The optional parameter is fine for me too, but we recently had a > > discussion where it was decided that we should add new commands instead > > of extending existing ones. > > > > Anthony, I believe we're already taking that position, right? > > This command was never in a released version. Then why does the argument has to be optional?
