Hi Thomas,
On 23/4/25 11:40, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 23/04/2025 11.31, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
Am 10. April 2025 06:05:35 UTC schrieb Thomas Huth <[email protected]>:
On 09/04/2025 22.26, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
Introduce a functional test which boots Debian 12 on the imx8mp-evk
board. Since
the root filesystem resides on an SD card, the test also verifies
the basic
operation of the USDHC.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <[email protected]>
--
v2:
* Make test file executable (Thomas)
* Omit fetch() (Thomas)
* Omit "-accel tcg" (Thomas)
* Add "snapshot=on" to make potential future tests independent
Supersedes: [email protected]
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
tests/functional/meson.build | 1 +
tests/functional/test_aarch64_imx8mp_evk.py | 66 ++++++++++++++++
+++++
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/functional/test_aarch64_imx8mp_evk.py
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index d54b5578f8..4ceffa89dc 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -833,6 +833,7 @@ F: include/hw/arm/fsl-imx8mp.h
F: include/hw/misc/imx8mp_*.h
F: include/hw/pci-host/fsl_imx8m_phy.h
F: docs/system/arm/imx8mp-evk.rst
+F: tests/functional/test_aarch64_imx8mp_evk.py
F: tests/qtest/rs5c372-test.c
MPS2 / MPS3
diff --git a/tests/functional/meson.build b/tests/functional/
meson.build
index 0f8be30fe2..aaaf3472f1 100644
--- a/tests/functional/meson.build
+++ b/tests/functional/meson.build
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ tests_aarch64_system_quick = [
tests_aarch64_system_thorough = [
'aarch64_aspeed',
+ 'aarch64_imx8mp_evk',
'aarch64_raspi3',
'aarch64_raspi4',
'aarch64_replay',
diff --git a/tests/functional/test_aarch64_imx8mp_evk.py b/tests/
functional/test_aarch64_imx8mp_evk.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..62fee74044
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/functional/test_aarch64_imx8mp_evk.py
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+#
+# Functional test that boots a Linux kernel and checks the console
+#
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+
+from qemu_test import LinuxKernelTest, Asset
+
In case you respin (due to other reasons), please add a second empty
line before the "class" statement (that's the style that we use in
the other tests, too).
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
Ping (not for 10.0)
Peter, should this go through your arm tree, or shall I pick it up with
other functional test patches for my next PR?
My preference would be like with previous Avocado tests: when a
(functional) test concerns mostly a dedicated subsystem, I'd rather see
the dedicated subsystem maintainers to take it, so they get familiar
with the test. Except if the maintainers are busy or unresponsive of
course.
