On Sunday 01 July 2007 07:29, andrzej zaborowski wrote: > On 5/24/07, sinisa marovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm afraid I will have to dissapoint you: it will be only isapc with no > > networking or other fancy devices. Main goal is the ability to run dos > > games. I do not know how familiar are you with PalmOS developer support. > > It is poor, gcc lack many important functions that have to be written > > from scratch. When I ported dosbox (which is written in c++) > > (Happily violating the GPL) > > Will the qemu port also be binary only?
What did he say that violates the GPL? Just because he is only porting the isapc stuff? I don't know any part of the GPL saying "when you port this, you must port all the features"... Or would such a port be inherently a violation due to system libraries being incompatible with the [L]GPL?