On 5/14/25 1:11 AM, [email protected] wrote:
From: Jim Shu <[email protected]> Add the missing implied rule from G to imafd_zicsr_zifencei. Signed-off-by: Jim Shu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <[email protected]> ---
Patch LGTM. I believe this will deprecate everything we're doing in riscv_cpu_validate_g() in tcg-cpu.c and we should remove it in this same patch. Thanks, Daniel
target/riscv/cpu.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c index d92874baa0..27edd5af62 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c @@ -2520,6 +2520,18 @@ static RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule RVV_IMPLIED = { }, };+static RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule RVG_IMPLIED = {+ .is_misa = true, + .ext = RVG, + .implied_misa_exts = RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD, + .implied_multi_exts = { + CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zicsr), + CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zifencei), + + RISCV_IMPLIED_EXTS_RULE_END + }, +}; + static RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule ZCB_IMPLIED = { .ext = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcb), .implied_multi_exts = { @@ -2898,7 +2910,7 @@ static RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule SSCTR_IMPLIED = {RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *riscv_misa_ext_implied_rules[] = {&RVA_IMPLIED, &RVD_IMPLIED, &RVF_IMPLIED, - &RVM_IMPLIED, &RVV_IMPLIED, NULL + &RVM_IMPLIED, &RVV_IMPLIED, &RVG_IMPLIED, NULL };RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *riscv_multi_ext_implied_rules[] = {
