Am 15.05.2012 18:19, schrieb Stefan Weil: > Commit 93e9eb6808c886f5f1c903b7ced1eed65de2ba39 added fdc-test, > but accidentally removed rtc-test because check-qtest-i386-y was > not enhanced but set twice. > > This patch adds rtc-test again (and sorts both tests alphabetically). > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> I wonder though if it might be better to always just use += because especially an alphabetical order risks us introducing the same fault again. Andreas > --- > tests/Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile > index f1b317a..ab7f667 100644 > --- a/tests/Makefile > +++ b/tests/Makefile > @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ check-block-$(CONFIG_POSIX) += tests/qemu-iotests-quick.sh > > # All QTests for now are POSIX-only, but the dependencies are > # really in libqtest, not in the testcases themselves. > -check-qtest-i386-y = tests/rtc-test$(EXESUF) > check-qtest-i386-y = tests/fdc-test$(EXESUF) > +check-qtest-i386-y += tests/rtc-test$(EXESUF) > check-qtest-x86_64-y = $(check-qtest-i386-y) > check-qtest-sparc-y = tests/m48t59-test$(EXESUF) > check-qtest-sparc64-y = tests/m48t59-test$(EXESUF) -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
