Am 15.05.2012 13:14, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 14 May 2012 18:31, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> Following up on your remark about ugly naming as a consequence of my CPU >> reset >> patches and my OMAP field rename, here's a few more patches. >> >> Patch 1 is spelling fixes in a comment and could be pulled into 1.1. >> >> Patches 2-7 fix some more naming ugliness that I missed when running >> because they were just "cpu->cpu". Again, fix by >> using "mpu" rather than "cpu". >> >> Patches 8-19 are what I had in mind with my choice of variable placement in >> the reset series. They clean up expressions in some targets, at the same time >> incur changes to other targets which would be needed for wiring up the CPU >> later anyway. >> >> Patches 20-22 are preparations cherry-picked from QOM CPUState part 4, which >> I'm including here since you indicated there might be a conflict with cp15 or >> qemu-linaro work. >> >> Please ack and indicate which merge order you would prefer. > > Series > Acked-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > (although note my remark about the Zynq board change).
Thanks, applied 2-11, 13-14, 16-18 to minimize v2. Patch 1 is irrelevant to my refactorings so I'd ask you, Peter, to queue it in case some other ARM patch for 1.1 comes along. Andreas > You might want to look at whether the pxa2xx changes conflict with the > cp15 series I just posted. Other than not wanting to have to respin > that series, I don't much care about merge order. > > thanks > -- PMM -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
