On Mon, 21 May 2012 16:09:28 +0200 Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Am 21.05.2012 15:59, schrieb Luiz Capitulino: > > On Fri, 18 May 2012 19:08:42 +0200 > > Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> Modified QMP commands > >> ===================== > > > > As we have discussed on the ML, we're not going to extend QMP commands. > > > > I understand your reasoning, and since the beginning I thought this was > > something useful to do, but we've already settled for not doing this. > > > > I also think that we shouldn't have exceptions, as in practice this means > > we're extending commands anyway. So either, we do it or we don't. > > What's the reason for disallowing command extensions? I'd find it rather > silly to maintain ten different functions that all do basically the > same, just that some of them have more optional parameters than others... See the subthread started by Anthony.
