Am 21.05.2012 20:20, schrieb Blue Swirl: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> Am 14.05.2012 23:22, schrieb Blue Swirl: >>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >>>> Am 14.05.2012 21:54, schrieb Blue Swirl: >>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >>>>>> Am 10.05.2012 02:13, schrieb Andreas Färber: >>>>>>> Andreas Färber (74): >>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> target-sparc: Let cpu_sparc_init() return SPARCCPU >>>>>>> sun4m: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU >>>>>>> sun4m: Pass SPARCCPU to {main,secondary}_cpu_reset() >>>>>>> sun4u: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU >>>>>>> sun4u: Let cpu_devinit() return SPARCCPU >>>>>>> sun4u: Store SPARCCPU in ResetData >>>>>>> leon3: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU >>>>>>> leon3: Store SPARCCPU in ResetData >>>>>> [...] >>>> >>>> Forgot to mention the bsd-user patch. >>>> >>>>>>> Kill off cpu_state_reset() >>>>>> >>>>>> Ping! Blue, can you ack please? >>>>> >>>>> Otherwise the patches look pretty safe ("if it compiles, it works"). >> >> Was I supposed to interpret that as an Acked-by? ;) > > No, but you may do so if it compiles. ;-)
Joking, are we? My cover letter indicated pretty clearly on what platforms I had already compile-tested on, and that meant each patch. I had also run `make check` on each and the sparc test image for sun4m, HelenOS for sun4u and "crible" for leon3. Applied the remainder of the series to qom-next: http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/afaerber.git/shortlog/refs/heads/qom-next Tristan/Fabien, could you please submit a patch to document the Leon3 machine in MAINTAINERS? No one got cc'ed on those two patches. Thanks. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg