Am 21.05.2012 20:20, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>> Am 14.05.2012 23:22, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>>>> Am 14.05.2012 21:54, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 10.05.2012 02:13, schrieb Andreas Färber:
>>>>>>> Andreas Färber (74):
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> target-sparc: Let cpu_sparc_init() return SPARCCPU
>>>>>>> sun4m: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU
>>>>>>> sun4m: Pass SPARCCPU to {main,secondary}_cpu_reset()
>>>>>>> sun4u: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU
>>>>>>> sun4u: Let cpu_devinit() return SPARCCPU
>>>>>>> sun4u: Store SPARCCPU in ResetData
>>>>>>> leon3: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU
>>>>>>> leon3: Store SPARCCPU in ResetData
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Forgot to mention the bsd-user patch.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Kill off cpu_state_reset()
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ping! Blue, can you ack please?
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise the patches look pretty safe ("if it compiles, it works").
>>
>> Was I supposed to interpret that as an Acked-by? ;)
>
> No, but you may do so if it compiles. ;-)
Joking, are we? My cover letter indicated pretty clearly on what
platforms I had already compile-tested on, and that meant each patch.
I had also run `make check` on each and the sparc test image for sun4m,
HelenOS for sun4u and "crible" for leon3.
Applied the remainder of the series to qom-next:
http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/afaerber.git/shortlog/refs/heads/qom-next
Tristan/Fabien, could you please submit a patch to document the Leon3
machine in MAINTAINERS? No one got cc'ed on those two patches. Thanks.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
