On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:07 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarb...@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> We're missing a strace entry for riscv_hwprobe, and using -strace will
> report it as "Unknown syscall 258".
>
> After this patch we'll have:
>
> $ ./build/qemu-riscv64 -strace test_mutex_riscv
> 110182 riscv_hwprobe(0x7f207efdc700,1,0,0,0,0) = 0
> 110182 brk(NULL) = 0x0000000000082000
> (...)
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com>

Thanks!

Applied to riscv-to-apply.next

Alistair

> ---
>  linux-user/strace.list | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/strace.list b/linux-user/strace.list
> index fdf94ef32a..ab818352a9 100644
> --- a/linux-user/strace.list
> +++ b/linux-user/strace.list
> @@ -1716,3 +1716,6 @@
>  { TARGET_NR_clock_gettime64, "clock_gettime64" , NULL, print_clock_gettime64,
>                             print_syscall_ret_clock_gettime64 },
>  #endif
> +#ifdef TARGET_NR_riscv_hwprobe
> +{ TARGET_NR_riscv_hwprobe, "riscv_hwprobe" , "%s(%p,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d)", NULL, 
> NULL },
> +#endif
> --
> 2.50.1
>
>

Reply via email to