Hi Philippe, September 22, 2025 at 1:31 PM, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" wrote: > > Richard Henderson proposed streamlining interrupts and exceptions for > > all targets and calling the hooks from a higher level rather than in > > each target code. However, there are a few obstacled and I decided to > > not do this as part of this series. > > > Does that mean another part is planned, and when it lands then these > patches will be reverted?
I don't have any tangible plans for a follow-up series. If I end up drafting one it will likely take a while. A follow-up series will likely not straight revert these changes since they essentially mark points where we would want to return some required additional information to said higher level. The hooks would instead vanish one by one as part of a migration. Regards, Julian
