On 29/09/25, Alistair Francis wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 7:37 AM Richard Henderson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 9/24/25 00:20, Anton Johansson via wrote: > > > +++ b/target/riscv/machine.c > > > @@ -84,13 +84,13 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_hyper = { > > > .minimum_version_id = 4, > > > .needed = hyper_needed, > > > .fields = (const VMStateField[]) { > > > - VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.hstatus, RISCVCPU), > > > - VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.hedeleg, RISCVCPU), > > > + VMSTATE_UINT64(env.hstatus, RISCVCPU), > > > + VMSTATE_UINT64(env.hedeleg, RISCVCPU), > > > > You can't change these sizes without bumping the version id. > > > > I don't know if riscv really cares about migration stability yet. > > If it does, then you have to jump through more hoops. > > Not really, I think a version bump would be enough > > Alistair
Thanks, I will address this in v2. //Anton
