On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 01:23:31PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:

> Do you need separate groupings ? If the maintainers are the same in both
> cases, and changes are liable to span both accel/mshv and target/i386/mshv
> dir, then perhaps  'target/i386/mshv/' is fine being listed under the
> 'MSHV' group ?

that's true. however, there is work ongoing to add MSHV support to other
targets, so eventually it wouldn't be the same maintainers for both.

Reply via email to