On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 5:11 AM Pierrick Bouvier
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 10/1/25 12:39 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 1/10/25 09:32, Anton Johansson wrote:
> >> According to version 20250508 of the privileged specification,
> >> mhpmeventn is 64 bits in size and mhpmeventnh is only ever used
> >> when XLEN == 32 and accesses the top 32 bits of the 64-bit
> >> mhpmeventn registers. Combine the two arrays of target_ulong
> >> mhpmeventh[] and mhpmevent[] to a single array of uint64_t.
> >>
> >> This also allows for some minor code simplification where branches
> >> handling either mhpmeventh[] or mhpmevent[] could be combined.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anton Johansson <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>    target/riscv/cpu.h     | 10 +++----
> >>    target/riscv/csr.c     | 67 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
> >>    target/riscv/machine.c |  3 +-
> >>    target/riscv/pmu.c     | 53 ++++++++-------------------------
> >>    4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> >> diff --git a/target/riscv/machine.c b/target/riscv/machine.c
> >> index 328fb674e1..d9939489e1 100644
> >> --- a/target/riscv/machine.c
> >> +++ b/target/riscv/machine.c
> >> @@ -452,8 +452,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = {
> >>            VMSTATE_UINT32(env.mcountinhibit, RISCVCPU),
> >>            VMSTATE_STRUCT_ARRAY(env.pmu_ctrs, RISCVCPU, 
> >> RV_MAX_MHPMCOUNTERS, 0,
> >>                                 vmstate_pmu_ctr_state, PMUCTRState),
> >> -        VMSTATE_UINTTL_ARRAY(env.mhpmevent_val, RISCVCPU, 
> >> RV_MAX_MHPMEVENTS),
> >> -        VMSTATE_UINTTL_ARRAY(env.mhpmeventh_val, RISCVCPU, 
> >> RV_MAX_MHPMEVENTS),
> >> +        VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY(env.mhpmevent_val, RISCVCPU, 
> >> RV_MAX_MHPMEVENTS),
> >
> > Each time you change a VMStateDescription structure you need to bump its
> > version.
>
> Maybe we could agree with Alistair if we prefer a single bump for whole
> series, or bump on any change within this series.

I'm fine with one bump in the series. Otherwise we end up with a huge
number of bumps

Alistair

>

Reply via email to