On 02.10.25 21:39, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Linux block devices require write zeroes alignment whereas files do not.

It may come as a surprise that block devices opened in buffered I/O mode
require the alignment although regular read/write requests do not.

Therefore it is necessary to populate the pwrite_zeroes_alignment field.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
---
  block/file-posix.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
index 8c738674ce..05c92c824d 100644
--- a/block/file-posix.c
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -1602,6 +1602,23 @@ static void raw_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, 
Error **errp)
bs->bl.pdiscard_alignment = dalign;
          }
+
+#ifdef __linux__
+        /*
+         * When request_alignment > 1, pwrite_zeroes_alignment does not need to
+         * be set explicitly. When request_alignment == 1, it must be set
+         * explicitly because Linux requires logical block size alignment.
+         */
+        if (bs->bl.request_alignment == 1) {
+            ret = probe_logical_blocksize(s->fd,
+                                          &bs->bl.pwrite_zeroes_alignment);
+            if (ret < 0) {
+                error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
+                                 "Failed to probe logical block size");

Isn't it too restrictive? Could we consider failed attempt to probe as 
permission
to proceed without write-zeroes alignment? In raw_probe_alignment, we fallback
to guessing request_alignment from memalign.

+                return;
+            }
+        }
+#endif /* __linux__ */
      }
raw_refresh_zoned_limits(bs, &st, errp);


--
Best regards,
Vladimir

Reply via email to