On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 11:10:19AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 9/29/25 18:57, Peter Xu wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 05:21:09PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > > The only user of this macro was VirtIONet.vlans, which has been > > > converted to regular VMSTATE_BUFFER. > .. > > I'm scanning over lost patches on the list. I suspect this is lost when > > you sent v2 replying to v1. > > This hasn't been lost due to v2 vs v1, - the reason was that the first > patch in the series was trivial, while the second (this one) is a bit > more than trivial, - so the first patch went through qemu-trivial, and > the second went nowhere :) > > > Wanna repost with a full v2 to catch Michael's attention once more? I also > > always would suggest a cover letter.. > Yeah, re-sending it is ok. Dunno what's the reason for the cover letter > though, for a single patch. > > Thank you for your attention - I'd lost it myself without you ;)
We might have lost each other somehow.. :) I am looking at this series that contains patch 1+2 on v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ v2 of patch 1 was sent in a reply here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ As of today's git master branch (commit 37ad0e48e9), I still didn't see patch 1 (v1 or v2) lands.. Thanks, -- Peter Xu
