On 13.10.25 11:11, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 05:04:06PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
Let's bring the documentation in line with the requirements. And
do check these requirements in QAPI parser.
This implicitly assumes that the requirements are desirable.
This is a large number of patches, showing the requirements are widely
ignored today. When I look at the changes in the patches my overwhealming
reaction is that they are not beneficial, which in turn makes me believe
the requirements should be changed to match the reality of the code,
rather than the reverse.
Markus, what do you think?
Maybe, add existing violations simply as exclusions to parser (maybe a mapping
{ file_name -> number_of_violations } ) ? This way we can add check for
new code, but avoid updating the old one.
Or should we change the requirements?
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
