On 10/16/25 21:33, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
On 10/16/25 09:34, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
-        /* Wait for one thread to report a quiescent state and try again.
+        /*
+         * Sleep for a while and try again.
           * Release rcu_registry_lock, so rcu_(un)register_thread() doesn't
           * wait too much time.
           *
@@ -133,7 +150,20 @@ static void wait_for_readers(void)
           * rcu_registry_lock is released.
           */
          qemu_mutex_unlock(&rcu_registry_lock);
-        qemu_event_wait(&rcu_gp_event);
+
+        if (forced) {
+            qemu_event_wait(&rcu_gp_event);
+
+            /*
+             * We want to be notified of changes made to rcu_gp_ongoing
+             * while we walk the list.
+             */
+            qemu_event_reset(&rcu_gp_event);
+        } else {
+            g_usleep(10000);
+            sleeps++;

Thanks a lot for this RCU improvement. It indeed removes the hard stalls
with unmapping of virtio-gpu blobs.

Am I understanding correctly that potentially we will be hitting this
g_usleep(10000) and stall virtio-gpu for the first ~10ms?

Would it help to have some kind of exponential backoff, starting with 1-3 ms and increasing after the first wait? Something like 1.5/3/6/12/12/12 ms would have a similar effect but reduce the wait if the vCPU kick is fast enough.

Paolo

I.e. the
MemoryRegion patches from Alex [1] are still needed to avoid stalls
entirely.

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/



Reply via email to