On 06/06/2012 05:44 AM, Michael Roth wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 04:08:55PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 05/06/2012 03:00, Michael Roth ha scritto:
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth<mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
qapi/qc.h | 11 +++++++++++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 qapi/qc.h
diff --git a/qapi/qc.h b/qapi/qc.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3b3a8b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/qapi/qc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+#ifndef QC_H
+#define QC_H
+
+#define qc_declaration
+#define _immutable
+#define _derived
+#define _broken
+#define _version(x)
+#define _size_is(x)
Would it be feasible to make the declaration look like the GCC attribute
extension, e.g.
struct RTCState QIDL() {
int foo QIDL(immutable);
int bar QIDL(derived);
};
so that you can just use "#define QIDL(...)"? This is how GCC
developers did their introspection annotations.
This does seem a lot cleaner to me, also simplifies the lexer and we get
namespacing for free.
Makes sense to me.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Paolo