ping, I've not received any reaction on this series[1]. Is there anything I can 
do to
move this forward?

Greetings,
Christian

[1]: 
https://patchew.org/QEMU/[email protected]/

On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 02:34:39PM +0200, Christian Speich wrote:
> This patch series improves the performance of read/write/erase operations
> on sdcards.
> 
> This is done by increasing the maximum buffer size that is worked on.
> >From 1 byte (master) to 512 bytes (first commit) to larger than 512
> (adma commit).
> 
> Testing on my system with fio I see the following rough performance 
> values in MiB/s.
> 
>               read write readwrite 
>        master:   6     6     3/  3
>  first commit:  51    43    23/ 23
> second commit: 392   180   144/143
> 
> Tested on a 2GiB raw image with:
>   fio --filename=/dev/mmcblk0 --direct=1 --runtime=60 --time_based --bs=128k 
> --rw={mode}
> 
> The adma values are somewhat unstable but always >100MiB/s, I'm not sure
> why but I guess it has something to do with the host side caching.
> 
> For erasing the third commit changes the erase operation to write zeros,
> as indicated by DATA_STAT_AFTER_ERASE in SCR.
> 
> The fourth commit allows erasure in large blocks, to speed it up
> significantly. Erasing 2GiB now takes 0.1s instead of 26s.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Speich <[email protected]>
> ---
> Christian Speich (4):
>       hw/sd: Switch from byte-wise to buf+len read/writes
>       hw/sd/sdhci: Don't use bounce buffer for ADMA
>       hw/sd/sdcard: Erase blocks to zero
>       hw/sd/sdcard: Erase in large blocks
> 
>  hw/sd/core.c       |  16 +---
>  hw/sd/sd.c         | 277 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  hw/sd/sdhci.c      | 102 +++++++++++---------
>  include/hw/sd/sd.h |  13 +--
>  4 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: e7c1e8043a69c5a8efa39d4f9d111f7c72c076e6
> change-id: 20250912-sdcard-performance-b4-d908bbb5a004
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Christian Speich <[email protected]>
> 
> 

Reply via email to