On 2012-06-08 10:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Yet another try :)
> 
> Normally the pci_add_capability is called on devices to add new
> capability. This is ok for emulated devices which capabilities list
> is being built by QEMU.
> 
> In the case of VFIO the capability may already exist and adding new

Why does it exit? VFIO should build the virtual capability list from
scratch (just like classic device assignment does), recreating the
layout of the physical device (except for masked out caps). In that
case, this conflict should become impossible, no?

But if pci_*add*_capability should actually be used like this (I doubt
this), some renaming would be required. "Add" sound like "append" to me,
not "update".

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Reply via email to