On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:45:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-06-08 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Am 08.06.2012 14:14, schrieb Jan Kiszka: > >> On 2012-06-08 14:03, Andreas Färber wrote: > >>> Can't understand that you're trying to push your v1 so hard now when our > >>> series have been on the list for much longer. ;) > >> > >> I explained the reason, and I think my patches (minus the dropped one) > >> are ready based on the feedback. > >> > >> I'm fine if important central refactorings close master for a short > >> period at the beginning of a merge window and require rebasing of other > >> patches afterward. But that should really be *short*. > > > > We had a long Hard Freeze that closed master. Your patches are new, so I > > oppose you sneaking by and having me rebase Paolo's patches on yours. If > > someone else wants to rebase them on yours that's fine with me. > > If your patches get merged over the next week, I'm fine. If not, be > warned to see me grumbling again. ;) > > Michael, unless there are other remarks, 1 and 3-10 could be picked up > by you and pushed already. I'll send an update for 6 to fix the commit log. > > Jan
They look ready to me too, so I can pick your patches up and put them on the pci branch. Prefer doing it Sunday when I'm rested. But FYI I just sent a pull request to Anthony Thursday and I try not to flood him with more than one a week unless there's a huge regression to fix. If large changes land in master meanwhile we'll have to resolve the conflict but that's par for the course. > -- > Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 > Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux