This is part of the ongoing effort to make Secure Boot for aarch64
libvirt guests possible[1].

I'd be happy to have the QAPI experts debunk my claim that there is
no semantically-meaningful way to represent this; in the meantime,
I'll be posting very shortly some libvirt patches that IMO prove that
supporting what I'm proposing here does not impose a significant
burden on consumers of the firmware descriptors.

[1] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-82645

Andrea Bolognani (2):
  docs/interop/firmware: Rename FirmwareFormat to FirmwareFlashFormat
  docs/interop/firmware: Introduce extended syntax for
    FirmwareMappingMemory

 docs/interop/firmware.json | 192 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.52.0


Reply via email to