Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on Mon, 5 Jan 2026 10:37:16 +0000: > Missing commit message explaining why we should do this ?
The reason for submitting this patch is that the newly supported 'info accelerators' command can provide a more comprehensive view of the accelerator's status. > > The 'hmp_info_kvm' implementation is unconditionally built and this patch > isn't changing that, so this result in building unused code. > > Conceptually even if KVM is not built, it makes sense to have an > 'info kvm' command to tell the user that KVM is not available. I agree with you, we can skip this patch. With regards, Bin Guo
